lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e13fe956-a52f-4b51-a84e-8bcf860bb8cf@gedalya.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:02:35 +0800
From: Gedalya <gedalya@...alya.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [resend] color: default to dark background

On 5/23/24 6:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> Overall, I am concerned that changing this will upset existing users.
> Not that it is impossible, just need more consensus and testing.

Makes sense.
It seems that possible negative impact would be when the following are all true:

1. Users actually using color. For debian and derivatives, up until now this
would have been people enabling color themselves.
Debian's recent enabling color by default was the impetus for this issue.

2. Using light background.

3. Not using COLORFGBG, or setting it incorrectly.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ