netdev - Re: [PATCH stable,5.15 0/2] Revert the patchset for fix CVE-2024-26865

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024052355-doze-implicate-236d@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 13:34:19 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuba@...nel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuniyu@...zon.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
	yuehaibing@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable,5.15 0/2] Revert the patchset for fix
 CVE-2024-26865

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:05:52AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. The "pernet" variable
> is introduced from v6.1-rc1. Revert pre-patch and post-patch.

I do not understand, why are these reverts needed?

How does the code currently build if there is no variable here?

confused,

greg k-h