netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 02/68] kselftest: Desecalate reporting of missing _GNU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d5471e30-227d-4e6d-9bbd-90a74bd9006b@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 12:01:59 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Edward Liaw <edliaw@...gle.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
 Günther Noack <gnoack@...gle.com>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Kees Cook
 <keescook@...omium.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/68] kselftest: Desecalate reporting of missing
 _GNU_SOURCE

On 5/22/24 20:28, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 5/22/24 10:46 AM, Edward Liaw wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:21 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:56:48AM +0000, Edward Liaw wrote:
> ...
>>> You've not provided a Signed-off-by for this so people can't do anything
>>> with it, please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for
>>> details on what this is and why it's important.
>>
>> Sorry, my mistake, I forgot to add it after cherry-picking.  If added
> 
> Adding this to your .gitconfig would cover you for cases like this, I think
> it's pretty common to do this:
> 
> [format]
>      signoff = true
> 
> 

Mark, Edward,

Is this patch still necessary of the series is dropped?

thanks,
-- Shuah