netdev - Re: [PATCH net] Revert "ixgbe: Manual AN-37 for troublesome link partners for X550 SFI"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <decbaab6-a9ab-4aa3-9285-0ffa98970c59@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:49:17 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: <kernel.org-fo5k2w@...arbi.fr>, Jeff Daly <jeffd@...icom-usa.com>, "Simon
 Horman" <horms@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "ixgbe: Manual AN-37 for troublesome link
 partners for X550 SFI"



On 5/23/2024 9:49 AM, kernel.org-fo5k2w@...arbi.fr wrote:
>>
> 
>> The link is an SFP-10GBase-CX1?
> 
> As I understand it, CX1 is the name given to Twinax copper cables such as the one I used in the experiments in this thread. It's therefore a priori the right value to display for this kind of connection (instead of “10000baseT/Full”).
> 
One more thing: Could you confirm if this behavior appears in the 5.19.9
driver from the Intel website or source forge? I'm curious if this is a
case of a fix that never got published to the netdev community.

Thanks,
Jake