[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ed19773-2a26-4652-bd62-0fc0e5c1233e@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 17:23:58 +0100
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Vadim Fedorenko
<vadfed@...a.com>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate
CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option
On 24/05/2024 17:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 5/24/24 1:06 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> Adjust skb program test to run with checksum validation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>
>
> BPF CI complains :
>
> [...]
>
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_skb_pkt_end.c:14:12: error: call to undeclared function 'BIT'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 14 | .flags = BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE,
> | ^
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:1429:42: note:
> expanded from macro 'BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE'
> 1429 | #define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE BIT(2)
> | ^
> 1 error generated.
> make: *** [Makefile:654:
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_pkt_end.test.o]
> Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: Leaving directory '/tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
> Error: Process completed with exit code 2.
Oops, looks like checkpatch.pl was too smart and replaced original
define with BIT() macro, but in one file only. I'll re-send it with
fixes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists