netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15 v2] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240524075436.YmcT7GSd@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 09:54:36 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15 v2] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via
 task_struct on PREEMPT_RT.

On 2024-05-22 09:09:45 [+0200], Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
> Yes, except I had to guess how the workload was split between CPUs ;-)
> 
> Thanks for doing these benchmarks! :-)

Thank you for all the explanations and walking me through it.
I'm going to update the patches as discussed and redo the numbers as
suggested here.
Thanks.

> --Jesper

Sebastian