[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92bc4c96-9aaa-056c-e59a-4396d19a9f58@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 17:33:00 +0800
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable,5.15 0/2] Revert the patchset for fix
CVE-2024-26865
On 2024/5/23 19:34, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:05:52AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>> There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. The "pernet" variable
>> is introduced from v6.1-rc1. Revert pre-patch and post-patch.
>
> I do not understand, why are these reverts needed?
>
> How does the code currently build if there is no variable here?
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
Hi greg:
If only the first patch is merged, compilation will fail.
There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo.
Thank you
Zhengchao Shao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists