netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] selftests/landlock: Add tcp_layers.ruleset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 23:09:13 +0200
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@...gle.com>
To: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@...wei-partners.com>
Cc: mic@...ikod.net, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gnoack3000@...il.com, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, yusongping@...wei.com, 
	artem.kuzin@...wei.com, konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] selftests/landlock: Add tcp_layers.ruleset_overlap
 to socket tests

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:30:11PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
> * Add tcp_layers fixture for tests that check multiple layer
>   configuration scenarios.
> 
> * Add test that validates multiple layer behavior with overlapped
>   restrictions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@...wei-partners.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> * Replaces test_socket_create() with test_socket().
> * Formats code with clang-format.
> * Refactors commit message.
> * Minor fixes.
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c  | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
> index 751596c381fe..52edc1a8ac21 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
> @@ -299,4 +299,113 @@ TEST_F(protocol, inval)
>  				       &protocol, 0));
>  }
>  
> +FIXTURE(tcp_layers)
> +{
> +	struct service_fixture srv0;
> +};
> +
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT(tcp_layers)
> +{
> +	const size_t num_layers;
> +};
> +
> +FIXTURE_SETUP(tcp_layers)
> +{
> +	const struct protocol_variant prot = {
> +		.family = AF_INET,
> +		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
> +	};
> +
> +	disable_caps(_metadata);
> +	self->srv0.protocol = prot;
> +	setup_namespace(_metadata);
> +};
> +
> +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(tcp_layers)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(tcp_layers, no_sandbox_with_ipv4) {
> +	/* clang-format on */
> +	.num_layers = 0,
> +};
> +
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(tcp_layers, one_sandbox_with_ipv4) {
> +	/* clang-format on */
> +	.num_layers = 1,
> +};
> +
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(tcp_layers, two_sandboxes_with_ipv4) {
> +	/* clang-format on */
> +	.num_layers = 2,
> +};
> +
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(tcp_layers, three_sandboxes_with_ipv4) {
> +	/* clang-format on */
> +	.num_layers = 3,
> +};
> +
> +TEST_F(tcp_layers, ruleset_overlap)
> +{
> +	const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> +		.handled_access_socket = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE,
> +	};
> +	const struct landlock_socket_attr tcp_create = {
> +		.allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE,
> +		.family = self->srv0.protocol.family,
> +		.type = self->srv0.protocol.type,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (variant->num_layers >= 1) {
> +		int ruleset_fd;
> +
> +		ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr,
> +						     sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> +		ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> +		/* Allows create. */
> +		ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
> +					       &tcp_create, 0));
> +		enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +	}
> +
> +	if (variant->num_layers >= 2) {
> +		int ruleset_fd;
> +
> +		/* Creates another ruleset layer with denied create. */
> +		ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr,
> +						     sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> +		ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> +		enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +	}
> +
> +	if (variant->num_layers >= 3) {
> +		int ruleset_fd;
> +
> +		/* Creates another ruleset layer. */
> +		ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr,
> +						     sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> +		ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> +		/* Try to allow create second time. */
> +		ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
> +					       &tcp_create, 0));
> +		enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> +		EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +	}
> +
> +	if (variant->num_layers < 2) {
> +		ASSERT_EQ(0, test_socket(&self->srv0));
> +	} else {
> +		ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_socket(&self->srv0));
> +	}
> +}

Wouldn't this be simpler if you did multiple checks in one test, in a sequence?

  * Expect that socket() works
  * Enforce ruleset 1 with a rule
  * Expect that socket() works
  * Enforce ruleset 2 without a rule
  * Expect that socket() fails
  * Enforce ruleset 3
  * Expect that socket() still fails

Then it would test the same and you would not need the fixture.
If you extracted these if bodies above into helper functions,
I think it would also read reasonably well.

—Günther