| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 21:21:03 +0000
From: zijianzhang@...edance.com
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
cong.wang@...edance.com,
xiaochun.lu@...edance.com,
Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] selftests: add MSG_ZEROCOPY msg_control notification test
From: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@...edance.com>
We update selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c to accommodate the new mechanism.
Test result from selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c,
cfg_notification_limit = 1, in this case MSG_ZEROCOPY approximately
aligns with the semantics of MSG_ZEROCOPY_UARG. In this case, the new
flag has around 13% cpu savings in TCP and 18% cpu savings in UDP.
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Test Type / Protocol| TCP v4 | TCP v6 | UDP v4 | UDP v6 |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| ZCopy (MB) | 5147 | 4885 | 7489 | 7854 |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| New ZCopy (MB) | 5859 | 5505 | 9053 | 9236 |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| New ZCopy / ZCopy | 113.83% | 112.69% | 120.88% | 117.59% |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
cfg_notification_limit = 32, it means less poll + recvmsg overhead,
the new mechanism performs 8% better in TCP. For UDP, no obvious
performance gain is observed and sometimes may lead to degradation.
Thus, if users don't need to retrieve the notification ASAP in UDP,
the original mechanism is preferred.
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Test Type / Protocol| TCP v4 | TCP v6 | UDP v4 | UDP v6 |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| ZCopy (MB) | 6272 | 6138 | 12138 | 10055 |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| New ZCopy (MB) | 6774 | 6620 | 11504 | 10355 |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| New ZCopy / ZCopy | 108.00% | 107.85% | 94.78% | 102.98% |
+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Signed-off-by: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@...edance.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaochun Lu <xiaochun.lu@...edance.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.sh | 1 +
2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c
index ba6c257f689c..48750a7a162c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Evaluate MSG_ZEROCOPY
*
* Send traffic between two processes over one of the supported
@@ -66,6 +67,10 @@
#define SO_ZEROCOPY 60
#endif
+#ifndef SCM_ZC_NOTIFICATION
+#define SCM_ZC_NOTIFICATION 78
+#endif
+
#ifndef SO_EE_CODE_ZEROCOPY_COPIED
#define SO_EE_CODE_ZEROCOPY_COPIED 1
#endif
@@ -74,6 +79,13 @@
#define MSG_ZEROCOPY 0x4000000
#endif
+#define ZC_MSGERR_NOTIFICATION 1
+#define ZC_MSGCTL_NOTIFICATION 2
+
+#define SOCK_ZC_INFO_NUM 8
+
+#define INVALID_ZEROCOPY_VAL 2
+
static int cfg_cork;
static bool cfg_cork_mixed;
static int cfg_cpu = -1; /* default: pin to last cpu */
@@ -86,13 +98,16 @@ static int cfg_runtime_ms = 4200;
static int cfg_verbose;
static int cfg_waittime_ms = 500;
static int cfg_notification_limit = 32;
-static bool cfg_zerocopy;
+static int cfg_zerocopy; /* Either 1 or 2, mode for SO_ZEROCOPY */
static socklen_t cfg_alen;
static struct sockaddr_storage cfg_dst_addr;
static struct sockaddr_storage cfg_src_addr;
static char payload[IP_MAXPACKET];
+static struct zc_info_elem zc_info[SOCK_ZC_INFO_NUM];
+static char zc_ckbuf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(void *))];
+static struct zc_info_elem *zc_info_ptr = zc_info;
static long packets, bytes, completions, expected_completions;
static int zerocopied = -1;
static uint32_t next_completion;
@@ -170,6 +185,26 @@ static int do_accept(int fd)
return fd;
}
+static void add_zcopy_info(struct msghdr *msg)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct cmsghdr *cm;
+
+ if (!msg->msg_control)
+ error(1, errno, "NULL user arg");
+ cm = (void *)msg->msg_control;
+ /* Although only the address of the array will be written into the
+ * zc_ckbuf, we assign cmsg_len to CMSG_LEN(sizeof(zc_info)) to specify
+ * the length of the array.
+ */
+ cm->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(zc_info));
+ cm->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET;
+ cm->cmsg_type = SCM_ZC_NOTIFICATION;
+ memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cm), &zc_info_ptr, sizeof(zc_info_ptr));
+ for (i = 0; i < SOCK_ZC_INFO_NUM; i++)
+ zc_info[i].zerocopy = INVALID_ZEROCOPY_VAL;
+}
+
static void add_zcopy_cookie(struct msghdr *msg, uint32_t cookie)
{
struct cmsghdr *cm;
@@ -183,7 +218,7 @@ static void add_zcopy_cookie(struct msghdr *msg, uint32_t cookie)
memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cm), &cookie, sizeof(cookie));
}
-static bool do_sendmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, bool do_zerocopy, int domain)
+static bool do_sendmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, int do_zerocopy, int domain)
{
int ret, len, i, flags;
static uint32_t cookie;
@@ -201,6 +236,15 @@ static bool do_sendmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, bool do_zerocopy, int domain)
msg->msg_controllen = CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(cookie));
msg->msg_control = (struct cmsghdr *)ckbuf;
add_zcopy_cookie(msg, ++cookie);
+ } else if (do_zerocopy == ZC_MSGCTL_NOTIFICATION) {
+ memset(&msg->msg_control, 0, sizeof(msg->msg_control));
+ /* Although only the address of the array will be written into the
+ * zc_ckbuf, msg_controllen must be larger or equal than any cmsg_len
+ * in it. Otherwise, we will get -EINVAL.
+ */
+ msg->msg_controllen = CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(zc_info));
+ msg->msg_control = (struct cmsghdr *)zc_ckbuf;
+ add_zcopy_info(msg);
}
}
@@ -219,7 +263,7 @@ static bool do_sendmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, bool do_zerocopy, int domain)
if (do_zerocopy && ret)
expected_completions++;
}
- if (do_zerocopy && domain == PF_RDS) {
+ if (msg->msg_control) {
msg->msg_control = NULL;
msg->msg_controllen = 0;
}
@@ -393,6 +437,42 @@ static bool do_recvmsg_completion(int fd)
return ret;
}
+static void do_recv_completions2(void)
+{
+ int i;
+ __u32 hi, lo, range;
+ __u8 zerocopy;
+
+ for (i = 0; zc_info[i].zerocopy != INVALID_ZEROCOPY_VAL; i++) {
+ struct zc_info_elem elem = zc_info[i];
+
+ hi = elem.hi;
+ lo = elem.lo;
+ zerocopy = elem.zerocopy;
+ range = hi - lo + 1;
+
+ if (cfg_verbose && lo != next_completion)
+ fprintf(stderr, "gap: %u..%u does not append to %u\n",
+ lo, hi, next_completion);
+ next_completion = hi + 1;
+
+ if (zerocopied == -1)
+ zerocopied = zerocopy;
+ else if (zerocopied != zerocopy) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "serr: inconsistent\n");
+ zerocopied = zerocopy;
+ }
+
+ completions += range;
+
+ if (cfg_verbose >= 2)
+ fprintf(stderr, "completed: %u (h=%u l=%u)\n",
+ range, hi, lo);
+ }
+
+ sendmsg_counter -= i;
+}
+
static bool do_recv_completion(int fd, int domain)
{
struct sock_extended_err *serr;
@@ -554,11 +634,15 @@ static void do_tx(int domain, int type, int protocol)
else
do_sendmsg(fd, &msg, cfg_zerocopy, domain);
- if (cfg_zerocopy && sendmsg_counter >= cfg_notification_limit)
+ if (cfg_zerocopy == ZC_MSGERR_NOTIFICATION &&
+ sendmsg_counter >= cfg_notification_limit)
do_recv_completions(fd, domain);
+ if (cfg_zerocopy == ZC_MSGCTL_NOTIFICATION)
+ do_recv_completions2();
+
while (!do_poll(fd, POLLOUT)) {
- if (cfg_zerocopy)
+ if (cfg_zerocopy == ZC_MSGERR_NOTIFICATION)
do_recv_completions(fd, domain);
}
@@ -716,7 +800,7 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
cfg_payload_len = max_payload_len;
- while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "46c:C:D:i:l:mp:rs:S:t:vz")) != -1) {
+ while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "46c:C:D:i:l:mnp:rs:S:t:vz")) != -1) {
switch (c) {
case '4':
if (cfg_family != PF_UNSPEC)
@@ -750,6 +834,9 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
case 'm':
cfg_cork_mixed = true;
break;
+ case 'n':
+ cfg_zerocopy = ZC_MSGCTL_NOTIFICATION;
+ break;
case 'p':
cfg_port = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
@@ -769,7 +856,7 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
cfg_verbose++;
break;
case 'z':
- cfg_zerocopy = true;
+ cfg_zerocopy = ZC_MSGERR_NOTIFICATION;
break;
}
}
@@ -780,6 +867,8 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
error(1, 0, "-D <server addr> required for PF_RDS\n");
if (!cfg_rx && !saddr)
error(1, 0, "-S <client addr> required for PF_RDS\n");
+ if (cfg_zerocopy == ZC_MSGCTL_NOTIFICATION)
+ error(1, 0, "PF_RDS does not support ZC_MSGCTL_NOTIFICATION");
}
setup_sockaddr(cfg_family, daddr, &cfg_dst_addr);
setup_sockaddr(cfg_family, saddr, &cfg_src_addr);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.sh
index 89c22f5320e0..022a6936d86f 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.sh
@@ -118,4 +118,5 @@ do_test() {
do_test "${EXTRA_ARGS}"
do_test "-z ${EXTRA_ARGS}"
+do_test "-n ${EXTRA_ARGS}"
echo ok
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists