[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240529104846.3d0b4651@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:48:46 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, borisp@...dia.com,
gal@...dia.com, cratiu@...dia.com, rrameshbabu@...dia.com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, tariqt@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 07/15] net: psp: update the TCP MSS to reflect
PSP packet overhead
On Sun, 12 May 2024 21:47:16 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > - inet_csk(newsk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = 0;
> > + inet_csk(newsk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = psp_sk_overhead(sk);
> > if (opt)
> > - inet_csk(newsk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = opt->opt_nflen +
> > - opt->opt_flen;
> > + inet_csk(newsk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len += opt->opt_nflen +
> > + opt->opt_flen;
> >
> > tcp_ca_openreq_child(newsk, dst);
>
> The below code adjusts ext_hdr_len and recalculates mss when
> setting the tx association.
>
> Why already include it at connect and syn_recv, above?
>
> My assumption was that the upgrade to PSP only happens during
> TCP_ESTABLISHED. But perhaps I'm wrong.
>
> Is it allowed to set rx and tx association even from as early as the
> initial socket(), when still in TCP_CLOSE, client-side?
>
> Server-side, there is no connection fd to pass to netlink commands
> before TCP_ESTABLISHED.
Mostly for symmetry, really. IDK what's worse, the dead code or that
someone may be surprised it's not there.. Should I delete it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists