netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] iproute2: color: default to dark background

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240529111122.7d384ed9@hermes.local>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:11:22 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Cc: Gedalya <gedalya@...alya.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iproute2: color: default to dark background

On Wed, 29 May 2024 18:51:01 +0100
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com> wrote:

> On 29/05/2024 17:36, Gedalya wrote:
> > That's not possible.  
> 
> Then in cases where the tool can't determine the answer, it
>  should not be using colour at all unless explicitly instructed
>  to do so, either on the command-line or in runtime
>  configuration like dotfiles, /etc, or envvars.
> "In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess."[1]
> 
> > The fact remains that the code currently makes an
> > assumption and I don't see why it is better than
> > the other way around.  
> 
> Because changing it would break it for people for whom it
>  currently works.  That's a regression, and regressions are
>  worse than existing bugs, ceteris paribus.
> "Assess[ing] what is more common" won't change that.
> 
> -ed
> 
> [1]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0020/#the-zen-of-python
> 

Debian maintainer decided to enable color by changing source.
Therefore, they should carry whatever color fixups they want as well.

Upstream will stay as default no color.