lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <971a2c3b-1cd9-48c5-aa50-e3c441277f0a@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 22:18:59 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: En-Wei WU <en-wei.wu@...onical.com>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 rickywu0421@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: irdma hardware init failed after
 suspend/resume

Dear En-Wei,


Thank you for responding so quickly.

Am 29.05.24 um 05:17 schrieb En-Wei WU:

[…]

>> What effect does this have on resume time?
> 
> When we call ice_init_rdma() at resume time, it will allocate entries
> at pf->irq_tracker.entries and update pf->msix_entries for later use
> (request_irq) by irdma.

Sorry for being unclear. I meant, does resuming the system take longer 
now? (initcall_debug might give a clue.)


Kind regards,

Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ