netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: support stacked switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 00:40:30 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: A. Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rogerq@...nel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com,
 c-vankar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: support
 stacked switches

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Tue, 28 May 2024 09:59:48 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
> 
> Currently an external Ethernet switch connected to a am65-cpsw-nuss CPU
> port will not be probed successfully because of_find_net_device_by_node()
> will not be able to find the netdev of the CPU port.
> 
> It's necessary to populate of_node of the struct device for the
> am65-cpsw-nuss ports. DT nodes of the ports are already stored in per-port
> private data, but because of some legacy reasons the naming ("phy_node")
> was misleading.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,1/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: rename phy_node -> port_np
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/78269025e192
  - [net-next,2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: populate netdev of_node
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/29c71bf2a05a

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html