netdev - Re: [TEST] Flake report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 19:35:56 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [TEST] Flake report

Hi Jakub,

(+ MPTCP ML, - authors of other unstable selftests)

On 10/05/2024 16:28, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 10/05/2024 01:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> (...)
> 
>> mptcp
>> -----
>> To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
>>
>> simult-flows-sh is still quite flaky :(
> 
> Yes, we need to find a solution for that. It is not as unstable on our
> side [1]. We will look at that next week. If we cannot find a solution
> quickly, we will skip the flaky subtests to stop the noise while
> continuing to investigate.
Now that the flaky MPTCP subtests results have been ignored, the results
look better:

  https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?br-cnt=88&tn-needle=mptcp

Do you think we could also stop ignoring them on NIPA side?

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.