[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7c714ae-6406-4661-a653-ef1888118d92@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 16:30:54 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: Introduce IORING_OP_BIND
On 5/31/24 3:12 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> +int io_bind_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> +{
> + struct io_bind *bind = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_bind);
> + struct sockaddr __user *uaddr;
> + struct io_async_msghdr *io;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (sqe->len || sqe->buf_index || sqe->rw_flags || sqe->splice_fd_in)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + uaddr = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
> + bind->addr_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr2);
> +
> + io = io_msg_alloc_async(req);
> + if (unlikely(!io))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = move_addr_to_kernel(uaddr, bind->addr_len, &io->addr);
> + if (ret)
> + io_req_msg_cleanup(req, 0);
> + return ret;
> +}
As mentioned in the other patch, I think this can just be:
return move_addr_to_kernel(uaddr, bind->addr_len, &io->addr);
}
and have normal cleanup take care of it.
> +int io_bind(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + struct io_bind *bind = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_bind);
> + struct io_async_msghdr *io = req->async_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = __sys_bind_socket(sock_from_file(req->file), &io->addr, bind->addr_len);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + req_set_fail(req);
> + io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Kill the empty line before return.
Outside of those minor nits, patch looks good!
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists