netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] mptcp: count CLOSE-WAIT sockets for MPTCP_MIB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iJZo2R3eOVvWpo3-5aoMaaEtzxH90H0iv0FQXPUz7aJyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 08:26:02 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, 
	dsahern@...nel.org, matttbe@...nel.org, martineau@...nel.org, 
	geliang@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] mptcp: count CLOSE-WAIT sockets for MPTCP_MIB_CURRESTAB

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 3:13 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
>
> Like previous patch does in TCP, we need to adhere to RFC 1213:
>
>   "tcpCurrEstab OBJECT-TYPE
>    ...
>    The number of TCP connections for which the current state
>    is either ESTABLISHED or CLOSE- WAIT."
>
> So let's consider CLOSE-WAIT sockets.
>
> The logic of counting
> When we increment the counter?
> a) Only if we change the state to ESTABLISHED.
>
> When we decrement the counter?
> a) if the socket leaves ESTABLISHED and will never go into CLOSE-WAIT,
> say, on the client side, changing from ESTABLISHED to FIN-WAIT-1.
> b) if the socket leaves CLOSE-WAIT, say, on the server side, changing
> from CLOSE-WAIT to LAST-ACK.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")

MPTCP was not part of linux at that time.