[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bab83f2c-c120-42b0-916f-44dc91d5da80@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:25:16 +0200
From: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, Brett Creeley
<brett.creeley@....com>, Pucha Himasekhar Reddy
<himasekharx.reddy.pucha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 6/8] ice: implement AQ download pkg retry
On 30.05.2024 18:50, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/2024 6:51 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 May 2024 15:06:09 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
>>> + while (try_cnt < 5) {
>>> + status = ice_aq_download_pkg(hw, bh, ICE_PKG_BUF_SIZE,
>>> + last, &offset, &info,
>>> + NULL);
>>> + if (hw->adminq.sq_last_status != ICE_AQ_RC_ENOSEC &&
>>> + hw->adminq.sq_last_status != ICE_AQ_RC_EBADSIG)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + try_cnt++;
>>> + msleep(20);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (try_cnt)
>>> + dev_dbg(ice_hw_to_dev(hw),
>>> + "ice_aq_download_pkg number of retries: %d\n",
>>> + try_cnt);
>>>
>>
>> That's not a great wait loop. Last iteration sleeps for 20msec and then
>> gives up without checking the condition.
>
> Yea, that seems rather silly.
>
> @Wojciech, would you please look into this?
Sure, I'll send next version
Powered by blists - more mailing lists