[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240601154213.7274767f@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:42:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>, Nicolas Pitre
<nico@...xnic.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Breno Leitao
<leitao@...ian.org>, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: smc91x: Refactor SMC_* macros
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:53:42 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c | 132 +++++++++++--------------
> > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.h | 152 ++++++++++++++---------------
> > 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
>
> This is a large and repetitive patch, which makes it hard to spot any errors
> (I couldn't see any :)
+1
While the spirit of the patch is right, I don't think we should
encouraging refactoring of ancient drivers. It's not a great use
of anyone's time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists