netdev - Re: [PATCH net] inet: bring NLM_DONE out to a separate recv() in inet_dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:10:13 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@...ddata.com>,
 dsahern@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: bring NLM_DONE out to a separate recv() in
 inet_dump_ifaddr()

On Sat,  1 Jun 2024 14:25:17 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> + * When used in combination with for_each_netdev_dump() - make sure to
> + * invalidate the ifindex when iteration is done. for_each_netdev_dump()
> + * does not move the iterator index "after" the last valid entry.
> + *
> + * NOTE: Do not use this helper for dumps without known legacy users!
> + *       Most families are accessed only using well-written libraries
> + *       so starting to coalesce NLM_DONE is perfectly fine, and more efficient.

Sorry, I disagree.

You can't just fix the problem areas. The split was an ABI change, and there could
be a problem in any dump. This the ABI version of the old argument 
  If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

All dumps must behave the same. You are stuck with the legacy behavior.