[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240603143231.62085-14-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:32:29 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net 13/15] af_unix: Use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in unix_release_sock().
If the socket type is SOCK_STREAM or SOCK_SEQPACKET, unix_release_sock()
checks the length of the peer socket's recvq under unix_state_lock().
However, unix_stream_read_generic() calls skb_unlink() after releasing
the lock. Also, for SOCK_SEQPACKET, __skb_try_recv_datagram() unlinks
skb without unix_state_lock().
Thues, unix_state_lock() does not protect qlen.
Let's use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in unix_release_sock().
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 88cda8af30d4..0c49c34551e6 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static void unix_release_sock(struct sock *sk, int embrion)
unix_state_lock(skpair);
/* No more writes */
WRITE_ONCE(skpair->sk_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK);
- if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) || embrion)
+ if (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) || embrion)
WRITE_ONCE(skpair->sk_err, ECONNRESET);
unix_state_unlock(skpair);
skpair->sk_state_change(skpair);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists