netdev - Re: [PATCH net] inet: bring NLM_DONE out to a separate recv() in inet_dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240603075941.297d1e56@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:59:41 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Stephen Hemminger
 <stephen@...workplumber.org>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@...ddata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: bring NLM_DONE out to a separate recv() in
 inet_dump_ifaddr()

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:22:19 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Hi Eric, how do you feel about this approach? It would also let us
> > extract the "RTNL unlocked dump" handling from af_netlink.c, which
> > would be nice.  
> 
> Sure, I have not thought of af_netlink
> 
> > BTW it will probably need to be paired with fixing the
> > for_each_netdev_dump() foot gun, maybe (untested):
> 
> I confess I am a bit lost : this part relates to your original submission,
> when you set "ctx->ifindex = ULONG_MAX;"  in inet_dump_ifaddr() ?

Yes, xa_for_each_start() leaves ifindex at the last valid entry, so
without this snippet it's not safe to call dump again after we reached
the end.