netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce fwctl subystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240604070451.79cfb280@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:04:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Itay
 Avraham <itayavr@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Saeed Mahameed
 <saeedm@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Andy Gospodarek
 <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>, Aron Silverton
 <aron.silverton@...cle.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Leonid
 Bloch <lbloch@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
 linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce fwctl subystem

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 21:01:58 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/3/24 12:42 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Somewhat related, I saw nVidia sells various interesting features in its
> > DOCA stack. Is that Open Source?  
> 
> Seriously, Jakub, how is that in any way related to this patch set?

Whether they admit it or not, DOCA is a major reason nVidia wants
this to be standalone rather than part of RDMA.

> You are basically suggesting that if any vendor ever has an out of tree
> option for its hardware every patch it sends should be considered a ruse
> to enable or simplify proprietary options.

Ooo, is that a sore spot?

I don't begrudge anyone building proprietary options, but leave
upstream out of it.