[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240604043041.GA28886@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:30:41 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ofir Gal <ofir.gal@...umez.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, kbusch@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, sagi@...mberg.me, philipp.reisner@...bit.com,
lars.ellenberg@...bit.com, christoph.boehmwalder@...bit.com,
idryomov@...il.com, xiubli@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] bugfix: Introduce sendpages_ok() to check
sendpage_ok() on contiguous pages
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 03:36:10PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2024 09:32:14 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I still find it hightly annoying that we can't have a helper that
> > simply does the right thing for callers, but I guess this is the
> > best thing we can get without a change of mind from the networking
> > maintainers..
>
> Change mind about what? Did I miss a discussion?
Having a net helper to just send some memory in the most efficient
way and leave it up to the networking code to decide if it wants
to use sendpage or sendmsg internally as needed instead of burdening
the caller.
This happened before sendpage_ok was added, so probably in 2020
and most involved Dave and not you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists