netdev - [PATCH v4 net-next 03/14] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240604154425.878636-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue,  4 Jun 2024 17:24:10 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/14] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache.

napi_alloc_cache is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
this data structure requires explicit locking.

Add a local_lock_t to the data structure and use local_lock_nested_bh()
for locking. This change adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter
the functional behaviour for !PREEMPT_RT.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index dda13fdffb697..b33bae4ba78b6 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ static void *page_frag_alloc_1k(struct page_frag_1k *nc, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 #endif
 
 struct napi_alloc_cache {
+	local_lock_t bh_lock;
 	struct page_frag_cache page;
 	struct page_frag_1k page_small;
 	unsigned int skb_count;
@@ -284,7 +285,9 @@ struct napi_alloc_cache {
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_frag_cache, netdev_alloc_cache);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct napi_alloc_cache, napi_alloc_cache);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct napi_alloc_cache, napi_alloc_cache) = {
+	.bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
 
 /* Double check that napi_get_frags() allocates skbs with
  * skb->head being backed by slab, not a page fragment.
@@ -308,6 +311,7 @@ void *__napi_alloc_frag_align(unsigned int fragsz, unsigned int align_mask)
 	struct napi_alloc_cache *nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache);
 
 	fragsz = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(fragsz);
+	guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 
 	return __page_frag_alloc_align(&nc->page, fragsz, GFP_ATOMIC,
 				       align_mask);
@@ -338,6 +342,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *napi_skb_cache_get(void)
 	struct napi_alloc_cache *nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache);
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
+	guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 	if (unlikely(!nc->skb_count)) {
 		nc->skb_count = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache,
 						      GFP_ATOMIC,
@@ -740,9 +745,13 @@ struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int len,
 		pfmemalloc = nc->pfmemalloc;
 	} else {
 		local_bh_disable();
+		local_lock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
+
 		nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache.page);
 		data = page_frag_alloc(nc, len, gfp_mask);
 		pfmemalloc = nc->pfmemalloc;
+
+		local_unlock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 		local_bh_enable();
 	}
 
@@ -806,11 +815,11 @@ struct sk_buff *napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len)
 		goto skb_success;
 	}
 
-	nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache);
-
 	if (sk_memalloc_socks())
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
 
+	local_lock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
+	nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache);
 	if (NAPI_HAS_SMALL_PAGE_FRAG && len <= SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(1024)) {
 		/* we are artificially inflating the allocation size, but
 		 * that is not as bad as it may look like, as:
@@ -832,6 +841,7 @@ struct sk_buff *napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len)
 		data = page_frag_alloc(&nc->page, len, gfp_mask);
 		pfmemalloc = nc->page.pfmemalloc;
 	}
+	local_unlock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 
 	if (unlikely(!data))
 		return NULL;
@@ -1429,6 +1439,7 @@ static void napi_skb_cache_put(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!kasan_mempool_poison_object(skb))
 		return;
 
+	guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 	nc->skb_cache[nc->skb_count++] = skb;
 
 	if (unlikely(nc->skb_count == NAPI_SKB_CACHE_SIZE)) {
-- 
2.45.1