netdev - [PATCH v4 net-next 06/14] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240604154425.878636-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue,  4 Jun 2024 17:24:13 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
	bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
	coreteam@...filter.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/14] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage.

brnf_frag_data_storage is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH
for its locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on
PREEMPT_RT this data structure requires explicit locking.

Add a local_lock_t to the data structure and use local_lock_nested_bh()
for locking. This change adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter
the functional behaviour for !PREEMPT_RT.

Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: coreteam@...filter.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index bf30c50b56895..9596ad19224ad 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static inline bool is_pppoe_ipv6(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 #define NF_BRIDGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH (PPPOE_SES_HLEN + ETH_HLEN)
 
 struct brnf_frag_data {
+	local_lock_t bh_lock;
 	char mac[NF_BRIDGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH];
 	u8 encap_size;
 	u8 size;
@@ -144,7 +145,9 @@ struct brnf_frag_data {
 	__be16 vlan_proto;
 };
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct brnf_frag_data, brnf_frag_data_storage);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct brnf_frag_data, brnf_frag_data_storage) = {
+	.bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
 
 static void nf_bridge_info_free(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -882,6 +885,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
 
 		IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
 
+		guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
 		data = this_cpu_ptr(&brnf_frag_data_storage);
 
 		if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) {
@@ -909,6 +913,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
 
 		IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
 
+		guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
 		data = this_cpu_ptr(&brnf_frag_data_storage);
 		data->encap_size = nf_bridge_encap_header_len(skb);
 		data->size = ETH_HLEN + data->encap_size;
-- 
2.45.1