[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240605182726.GX19897@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:27:26 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Itay Avraham <itayavr@...dia.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>,
Aron Silverton <aron.silverton@...cle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
Leonid Bloch <lbloch@...dia.com>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] fwctl: Basic ioctl dispatch for the character device
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 12:07:37PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I don't recall that dramatic conclusion in the discussion, but it does
> > make alot of sense to me.
>
> I'll be less lazy (and today found the search foo to track it down).
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wicfvWPuRVDG5R1mZSxD8Xg=-0nLOiHay2T_UJ0yDX42g@mail.gmail.com/
Oh that is a bit different discussion than I was thinking of.. I fixed
all the cases to follow this advise and checked that all the free
functions are proper pairs of whatever is being allocated.
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists