[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202406070616.vNSLJTt2-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 04:34:09 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] virtio_net: improve dim command request
efficiency
Hi Heng,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Heng-Qi/virtio_net-passing-control_buf-explicitly/20240606-141748
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606061446.127802-5-hengqi%40linux.alibaba.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] virtio_net: improve dim command request efficiency
config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240607/202406070616.vNSLJTt2-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240607/202406070616.vNSLJTt2-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406070616.vNSLJTt2-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/virtio_net.c: In function 'virtnet_get_cvq_work':
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c:2841:20: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' [-Wdangling-else]
2841 | if (wait_coal)
| ^
vim +/else +2841 drivers/net/virtio_net.c
2813
2814 static void virtnet_get_cvq_work(struct work_struct *work)
2815 {
2816 struct virtnet_info *vi =
2817 container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, get_cvq);
2818 struct virtnet_coal_node *wait_coal;
2819 bool valid = false;
2820 unsigned int tmp;
2821 void *res;
2822
2823 mutex_lock(&vi->cvq_lock);
2824 while ((res = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp)) != NULL) {
2825 complete((struct completion *)res);
2826 valid = true;
2827 }
2828 mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
2829
2830 if (!valid)
2831 return;
2832
2833 while (true) {
2834 wait_coal = NULL;
2835 mutex_lock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
2836 if (!list_empty(&vi->coal_wait_list))
2837 wait_coal = list_first_entry(&vi->coal_wait_list,
2838 struct virtnet_coal_node,
2839 list);
2840 mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> 2841 if (wait_coal)
2842 if (virtnet_add_dim_command(vi, wait_coal))
2843 break;
2844 else
2845 break;
2846 }
2847 }
2848 static int virtnet_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
2849 {
2850 struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
2851 struct virtio_device *vdev = vi->vdev;
2852 int ret;
2853 struct sockaddr *addr;
2854 struct scatterlist sg;
2855
2856 if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY))
2857 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
2858
2859 addr = kmemdup(p, sizeof(*addr), GFP_KERNEL);
2860 if (!addr)
2861 return -ENOMEM;
2862
2863 ret = eth_prepare_mac_addr_change(dev, addr);
2864 if (ret)
2865 goto out;
2866
2867 if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR)) {
2868 sg_init_one(&sg, addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len);
2869 if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
2870 VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
2871 dev_warn(&vdev->dev,
2872 "Failed to set mac address by vq command.\n");
2873 ret = -EINVAL;
2874 goto out;
2875 }
2876 } else if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) &&
2877 !virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
2878 unsigned int i;
2879
2880 /* Naturally, this has an atomicity problem. */
2881 for (i = 0; i < dev->addr_len; i++)
2882 virtio_cwrite8(vdev,
2883 offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, mac) +
2884 i, addr->sa_data[i]);
2885 }
2886
2887 eth_commit_mac_addr_change(dev, p);
2888 ret = 0;
2889
2890 out:
2891 kfree(addr);
2892 return ret;
2893 }
2894
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists