[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <988BFB51-32C8-499C-837D-91CC1C0FFE42@net-swift.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:50:56 +0800
From: "mengyuanlou@...-swift.com" <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>,
温端强 <duanqiangwen@...-swift.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] add sriov support for wangxun NICs
> 2024年6月6日 21:52,Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> 写道:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 18:13:07 +0800 mengyuanlou@...-swift.com wrote:
>>> You have cut out the ndo_set_vf_* calls but you seem to add no uAPI
>>> access beyond just enabling the PCI SR-IOV capability. What's your plan
>>> of making this actually usable? It's a very strange submission.
>>
>> Vf driver(wxvf) will be submitted later, uAPI for virtual network devices will
>> be added in it.
>
> I mean the configuration API equivalent to the legacy NDOs.
>
It starts here.
- https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240403185300.702a8271@kernel.org/
> + .ndo_set_vf_spoofchk = wx_ndo_set_vf_spoofchk,
> + .ndo_set_vf_link_state = wx_ndo_set_vf_link_state,
> + .ndo_get_vf_config = wx_ndo_get_vf_config,
> + .ndo_set_vf_vlan = wx_ndo_set_vf_vlan,
> + .ndo_set_vf_mac = wx_ndo_set_vf_mac,
Whether these interfaces are going to be deprecated, and I have no idea
about what new apis can replace the ndo_{set|get}_vf_xxx interfaces.
I have seen recently submitted driver(octeon_ep) which support sriov, do not
add ndo_{set|get}_vf_xxx interfaces.
- https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215181425.2681426-1-srasheed@marvell.com/
If I have missed some docs or code?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists