netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ice: move devlink locking outside the port creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240606175634.2e42fca8@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:56:34 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, Sujai Buvaneswaran
 <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ice: move devlink locking outside the port
 creation

On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 13:40:43 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> In case of subfunction lock will be taken for whole port creation. Do
> the same in VF case.

No interactions with other locks worth mentioning?

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c
> index 704e9ad5144e..f774781ab514 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c
> @@ -794,10 +794,8 @@ int ice_devlink_rate_init_tx_topology(struct devlink *devlink, struct ice_vsi *v
>  
>  	tc_node = pi->root->children[0];
>  	mutex_lock(&pi->sched_lock);
> -	devl_lock(devlink);
>  	for (i = 0; i < tc_node->num_children; i++)
>  		ice_traverse_tx_tree(devlink, tc_node->children[i], tc_node, pf);
> -	devl_unlock(devlink);
>  	mutex_unlock(&pi->sched_lock);

Like this didn't use to cause a deadlock?

Seems ice_devlink_rate_node_del() takes this lock and it's already
holding the devlink instance lock.