[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmMuh5mkK7w7s/3L@pop-os.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:00:07 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...adoghq.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recursive locking in sockmap
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:09:59PM +0200, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:47 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:00 PM Vincent Whitchurch
> > <vincent.whitchurch@...adoghq.com> wrote:
> > > With a socket in the sockmap, if there's a parser callback installed
> > > and the verdict callback returns SK_PASS, the kernel deadlocks
> > > immediately after the verdict callback is run. This started at commit
> > > 6648e613226e18897231ab5e42ffc29e63fa3365 ("bpf, skmsg: Fix NULL
> > > pointer dereference in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue").
> > >
> > > It can be reproduced by running ./test_sockmap -t ping
> > > --txmsg_pass_skb. The --txmsg_pass_skb command to test_sockmap is
> > > available in this series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240606-sockmap-splice-v1-0-4820a2ab14b5@datadoghq.com/.
> >
> > I don't have time right now to look into this issue carefully until
> > this weekend. BTW, did you mean the patch [2/5] in the link that can
> > solve the problem?
>
> No. That patch set addresses a different problem which occurs even if
> only a verdict callback is used. But patch 4/5 in that patch set adds
> the --txmsg_pass_skb option to the test_sockmap test program, and that
> option can be used to reproduce this deadlock too.
I think we can remove that write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock). Can you
test the following patch?
------------>
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index fd20aae30be2..da64ded97f3a 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -1116,9 +1116,7 @@ static void sk_psock_strp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
if (tls_sw_has_ctx_rx(sk)) {
psock->saved_data_ready(sk);
} else {
- write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
strp_data_ready(&psock->strp);
- write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists