[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240610223501.73191-3-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:34:52 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/11] af_unix: Define locking order for U_LOCK_SECOND in unix_state_double_lock().
unix_dgram_connect() and unix_dgram_{send,recv}msg() lock the socket
and peer in ascending order of the socket address.
Let's define the order as unix_state_lock_cmp_fn() instead of using
unix_state_lock_nested().
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index b0a9891c0384..16878452eaad 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -132,6 +132,18 @@ static int unix_table_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a,
{
return a < b ? -1 : 0;
}
+
+static int unix_state_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *_a,
+ const struct lockdep_map *_b)
+{
+ const struct unix_sock *a, *b;
+
+ a = container_of(_a, struct unix_sock, lock.dep_map);
+ b = container_of(_b, struct unix_sock, lock.dep_map);
+
+ /* unix_state_double_lock(): ascending address order. */
+ return a < b ? -1 : 0;
+}
#endif
static unsigned int unix_unbound_hash(struct sock *sk)
@@ -985,6 +997,7 @@ static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int kern,
u->path.dentry = NULL;
u->path.mnt = NULL;
spin_lock_init(&u->lock);
+ lock_set_cmp_fn(&u->lock, unix_state_lock_cmp_fn, NULL);
mutex_init(&u->iolock); /* single task reading lock */
mutex_init(&u->bindlock); /* single task binding lock */
init_waitqueue_head(&u->peer_wait);
@@ -1333,11 +1346,12 @@ static void unix_state_double_lock(struct sock *sk1, struct sock *sk2)
unix_state_lock(sk1);
return;
}
+
if (sk1 > sk2)
swap(sk1, sk2);
unix_state_lock(sk1);
- unix_state_lock_nested(sk2, U_LOCK_SECOND);
+ unix_state_lock(sk2);
}
static void unix_state_double_unlock(struct sock *sk1, struct sock *sk2)
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists