lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ed2275c-7887-4ce1-9b1d-3b51e9f47174@grimberg.me>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:07:41 +0300
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de,
 kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...com, chaitanyak@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 00/20] nvme-tcp receive offloads



On 31/05/2024 4:39, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 16:00:33 +0000 Aurelien Aptel wrote:
>> These offloads are similar in nature to the packet-based NIC TLS offloads,
>> which are already upstream (see net/tls/tls_device.c).
>> You can read more about TLS offload here:
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/tls-offload.html
> Which I had to send a fix for blindly again today:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530232607.82686-1-kuba@kernel.org/
> because there is no software model and none of the vendors apparently
> cares enough to rigorously test it.
>
> I'm not joking with the continuous tests.

Is there any plans to address the testing concerns here?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ