[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5cb092d-dccd-48a4-b1da-4f057581618e@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:37:04 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Jose Abreu
<joabreu@...opsys.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] ARM: dts: stm32: add ethernet1 and ethernet2
support on stm32mp13
On 6/10/24 10:06 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Marek
Hi,
> On 6/7/24 14:48, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 6/7/24 11:57 AM, Christophe Roullier wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -1505,6 +1511,38 @@ sdmmc2: mmc@...07000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
> no space here ?
>>> + ethernet1: ethernet@...0a000 {
>>> + compatible = "st,stm32mp13-dwmac", "snps,dwmac-4.20a";
>>> + reg = <0x5800a000 0x2000>;
>>> + reg-names = "stmmaceth";
>>> + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 62
>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <&exti 68 1>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "macirq", "eth_wake_irq";
>>> + clock-names = "stmmaceth",
>>> + "mac-clk-tx",
>>> + "mac-clk-rx",
>>> + "ethstp",
>>> + "eth-ck";
>>> + clocks = <&rcc ETH1MAC>,
>>> + <&rcc ETH1TX>,
>>> + <&rcc ETH1RX>,
>>> + <&rcc ETH1STP>,
>>> + <&rcc ETH1CK_K>;
>>> + st,syscon = <&syscfg 0x4 0xff0000>;
>>> + snps,mixed-burst;
>>> + snps,pbl = <2>;
>>> + snps,axi-config = <&stmmac_axi_config_1>;
>>> + snps,tso;
>>> + access-controllers = <&etzpc 48>;
>>
>> Keep the list sorted.
>
> The list is currently not sorted. I agree that it is better to have a
> common rule to easy the read but it should be applied to all the nodes
> for the whole STM32 family. Maybe to address by another series. For the
> time being we can keep it as it is.
Why is the st,... and snps,... swapped anyway ? That can be fixed right
here.
Why is the access-controllers at the end ? That can be fixed in separate
series, since that seems to have proliferated considerably.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists