[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32ed65af-8d7a-46c0-ae34-c082b60302bb@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:25:51 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tomoyo tree with the net-next
tree
On 2024/06/11 10:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> It looks like the tomoyo tree commit should just be completely dropped?
Thank you for notification.
I want a tree for testing orphaned patches (which nobody is willing to take,
and as a result bugs remain unfixed for years) before sending to Linus, and
a tree for testing debug patches (where nobody can debug without additional
code, and as a result bugs remain unfixed for years).
I am for now using the tomoyo tree for such purpose because linux-next tree
is tested by syzbot. I appreciate if network people can carry c2bfadd666b5
("rtnetlink: print rtnl_mutex holder/waiter for debug purpose") in one of
trees syzbot tests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists