netdev - [RFC PATCH net-next 4/9] flow_dissector: prepare for encapsulated control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 23:53:37 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 4/9] flow_dissector: prepare for encapsulated control flags

Rename skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_addr_type() to
skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_control(), and make it set both
addr_type and flags in FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL.

Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
---
 net/core/flow_dissector.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index 59fe46077b3ca..86a11a01445ad 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -299,9 +299,10 @@ void skb_flow_dissect_meta(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_flow_dissect_meta);
 
 static void
-skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_addr_type(enum flow_dissector_key_id type,
-				   struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
-				   void *target_container)
+skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_control(enum flow_dissector_key_id type,
+				 u32 ctrl_flags,
+				 struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
+				 void *target_container)
 {
 	struct flow_dissector_key_control *ctrl;
 
@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_addr_type(enum flow_dissector_key_id type,
 					 FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL,
 					 target_container);
 	ctrl->addr_type = type;
+	ctrl->flags = ctrl_flags;
 }
 
 void
@@ -367,6 +369,7 @@ skb_flow_dissect_tunnel_info(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 {
 	struct ip_tunnel_info *info;
 	struct ip_tunnel_key *key;
+	u32 ctrl_flags = 0;
 
 	/* A quick check to see if there might be something to do. */
 	if (!dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
@@ -395,9 +398,9 @@ skb_flow_dissect_tunnel_info(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	switch (ip_tunnel_info_af(info)) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_addr_type(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV4_ADDRS,
-						   flow_dissector,
-						   target_container);
+		skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_control(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV4_ADDRS,
+						 ctrl_flags, flow_dissector,
+						 target_container);
 		if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
 				       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV4_ADDRS)) {
 			struct flow_dissector_key_ipv4_addrs *ipv4;
@@ -410,9 +413,9 @@ skb_flow_dissect_tunnel_info(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 		}
 		break;
 	case AF_INET6:
-		skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_addr_type(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV6_ADDRS,
-						   flow_dissector,
-						   target_container);
+		skb_flow_dissect_set_enc_control(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV6_ADDRS,
+						 ctrl_flags, flow_dissector,
+						 target_container);
 		if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
 				       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV6_ADDRS)) {
 			struct flow_dissector_key_ipv6_addrs *ipv6;
-- 
2.45.1