lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:11:05 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Michael Chan
 <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, Andy Gospodarek
 <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>, Adrian Alvarado
 <adrian.alvarado@...adcom.com>, Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] bnxt_en: implement
 netdev_queue_mgmt_ops

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:19:47 -0700 David Wei wrote:
> Any validation would be done outside of this patchset, which only
> focuses on resetting an Rx queue. Reconfiguring page pools and HDS is
> orthogonal and unrelated to this patchset.
> 
> The netdev core API consuming netdev_queue_mgmt_ops would be
> netdev_rx_queue_restart() added in [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240607005127.3078656-2-almasrymina@google.com/
> 
> Validation would be done at a layer above, i.e. whatever that calls
> netdev_rx_queue_restart(), as opposed to netdev_rx_queue_restart() or
> netdev_queue_mgmt_ops itself.

One could be tempted to pass a "configuration" object to tell the
driver that this queue will be required to run with HDS enabled.
I wonder where I've seen such a thing...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ