netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dqs: introduce IFF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:25:47 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, 
	dsahern@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, 
	xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com, leitao@...ian.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dqs: introduce IFF_NO_BQL private flag
 for non-BQL drivers

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 5:02 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:55:16 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > I wonder why the status of this patch was changed to 'Changes
> > Requested'? Is there anything else I should adjust?
>
> Sorry to flip the question on you, but do you think the patch should
> be merged as is? Given Jiri is adding BQL support to virtio?

Also what is the rationale for all this discussion ?

Don't we have many sys files that are never used anyway ?