netdev - [PATCH net-next] eth: lan966x: don't clear unsupported stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:32:22 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next] eth: lan966x: don't clear unsupported stats

Commit 12c2d0a5b8e2 ("net: lan966x: add ethtool configuration and statistics")
added support for various standard stats. We should not clear the stats
which are not collected by the device. Core code uses a special
initializer to detect when device does not report given stat.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com
CC: UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ethtool.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ethtool.c
index 06811c60d598..c0fc85ac5db3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ethtool.c
@@ -376,7 +376,6 @@ static void lan966x_get_eth_mac_stats(struct net_device *dev,
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_PMAC_BC];
 	mac_stats->SingleCollisionFrames =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_COL];
-	mac_stats->MultipleCollisionFrames = 0;
 	mac_stats->FramesReceivedOK =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_RX_UC] +
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_RX_MC] +
@@ -384,26 +383,19 @@ static void lan966x_get_eth_mac_stats(struct net_device *dev,
 	mac_stats->FrameCheckSequenceErrors =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_RX_CRC] +
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_RX_CRC];
-	mac_stats->AlignmentErrors = 0;
 	mac_stats->OctetsTransmittedOK =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_OCT] +
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_PMAC_OCT];
 	mac_stats->FramesWithDeferredXmissions =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_MM_HOLD];
-	mac_stats->LateCollisions = 0;
-	mac_stats->FramesAbortedDueToXSColls = 0;
-	mac_stats->FramesLostDueToIntMACXmitError = 0;
-	mac_stats->CarrierSenseErrors = 0;
 	mac_stats->OctetsReceivedOK =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_RX_OCT];
-	mac_stats->FramesLostDueToIntMACRcvError = 0;
 	mac_stats->MulticastFramesXmittedOK =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_MC] +
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_PMAC_MC];
 	mac_stats->BroadcastFramesXmittedOK =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_BC] +
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_TX_PMAC_BC];
-	mac_stats->FramesWithExcessiveDeferral = 0;
 	mac_stats->MulticastFramesReceivedOK =
 		lan966x->stats[idx + SYS_COUNT_RX_MC];
 	mac_stats->BroadcastFramesReceivedOK =
-- 
2.45.2