netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/3] IB/mlx5: Create UMR QP just before first reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:06:00 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/3] IB/mlx5: Create UMR QP just before first
 reg_mr occurs

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:30:03PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 01:26:38PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
> > 
> > UMR QP is not used in some cases, so move QP and its CQ creations from
> > driver load flow to the time first reg_mr occurs, that is when MR
> > interfaces are first called.
> 
> We use UMR for kernel MRs too, don't we?

Strange, I know that I answered to this email, but I don't see it in the ML.

As far as I checked, we are not. Did I miss something?

Thanks

> 
> Jason