[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f6dfc4920694035bf630fccc4f3a943@realtek.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 03:16:27 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch"
<andrew@...n.ch>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"horms@...nel.org"
<horms@...nel.org>,
"rkannoth@...vell.com" <rkannoth@...vell.com>,
"Ping-Ke
Shih" <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v20 08/13] rtase: Implement net_device_ops
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:43:16 +0800 Justin Lai wrote:
> > +static void rtase_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats) {
> > + const struct rtase_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + const struct rtase_counters *counters;
> > +
> > + counters = tp->tally_vaddr;
> > +
> > + if (!counters)
> > + return;
>
> Same question about how this can be null as in the ethtool patch..
This check seems unnecessary, I will remove it.
>
> > + netdev_stats_to_stats64(stats, &dev->stats);
>
> Please dont use this field, there is a comment on it:
>
> struct net_device_stats stats; /* not used by modern drivers */
>
> You can store the fields you need for counters in struct rtase_private
Ok, I will remove all parts that use struct net_device_stats stats.
>
> > + dev_fetch_sw_netstats(stats, dev->tstats);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists