lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKHmtrTkTJPHS1ken=ecx+C4z-LcG0OW62hoE6pAX3FUeX_c8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:25:32 -0400
From: David Ruth <druth@...omium.org>
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, 
	jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, syzbot+b87c222546179f4513a7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net/sched: cls_api: fix possible infinite loop
 in tcf_idr_check_alloc()

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> Syzbot is reproducing in net, so the patch should target the net tree.

Ack. Will resend to net.

> Also missing the following tag:
> Fixes: 4b55e86736d5 ("net/sched: act_api: rely on rcu in
> tcf_idr_check_alloc")

My understanding is that this issue is significantly older than that
change, and therefore does not fix that change. Should I still apply
that fixes tag?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ