netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/2] vsock/virtio: avoid enqueue packets when work queue is empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:55:43 +0200
From: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
To: sgarzare@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	stefanha@...hat.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Marco Pinna <marco.pinn95@...il.com>,
	Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] vsock/virtio: avoid enqueue packets when work queue is empty

From: Marco Pinna <marco.pinn95@...il.com>

This introduces an optimization in virtio_transport_send_pkt:
when the work queue (send_pkt_queue) is empty the packet is
put directly in the virtqueue reducing latency.

In the following benchmark (pingpong mode) the host sends
a payload to the guest and waits for the same payload back.

Tool: Fio version 3.37-56
Env: Phys host + L1 Guest
Payload: 4k
Runtime-per-test: 50s
Mode: pingpong (h-g-h)
Test runs: 50
Type: SOCK_STREAM

Before (Linux 6.8.11)
------
mean(1st percentile):     722.45 ns
mean(overall):           1686.23 ns
mean(99th percentile):  35379.27 ns

After
------
mean(1st percentile):     602.62 ns
mean(overall):           1248.83 ns
mean(99th percentile):  17557.33 ns

Co-developed-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pinna <marco.pinn95@...il.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index c930235ecaec..e89bf87282b2 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -214,7 +214,9 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
 	struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
+	bool use_worker = true;
 	int len = skb->len;
+	int ret = -1;
 
 	hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
 
@@ -235,8 +237,34 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (virtio_vsock_skb_reply(skb))
 		atomic_inc(&vsock->queued_replies);
 
-	virtio_vsock_skb_queue_tail(&vsock->send_pkt_queue, skb);
-	queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
+	/* If the send_pkt_queue is empty there is no need to enqueue the packet.
+	 * Just put it on the ringbuff using virtio_transport_send_skb.
+	 */
+
+	if (skb_queue_empty_lockless(&vsock->send_pkt_queue)) {
+		bool restart_rx = false;
+		struct virtqueue *vq;
+
+		mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+
+		vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
+
+		ret = virtio_transport_send_skb(skb, vq, vsock, &restart_rx);
+		if (ret == 0) {
+			use_worker = false;
+			virtqueue_kick(vq);
+		}
+
+		mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+
+		if (restart_rx)
+			queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
+	}
+
+	if (use_worker) {
+		virtio_vsock_skb_queue_tail(&vsock->send_pkt_queue, skb);
+		queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
+	}
 
 out_rcu:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.45.2