netdev - Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC net-next 1/7] selftests: openvswitch: Support explicit tunnel port creation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240616162512.GI8447@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:25:12 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
	Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC net-next 1/7] selftests: openvswitch: Support
 explicit tunnel port creation.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 02:13:27PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> The OVS module can operate in conjunction with various types of
> tunnel ports.  These are created as either explicit tunnel vport
> types, OR by creating a tunnel interface which acts as an anchor
> for the lightweight tunnel support.
> 
> This patch adds the ability to add tunnel ports to an OVS
> datapath for testing various scenarios with tunnel ports.  With
> this addition, the vswitch "plumbing" will at least be able to
> push packets around using the tunnel vports.  Future patches
> will add support for setting required tunnel metadata for lwts
> in the datapath.  The end goal will be to push packets via these
> tunnels, and will be used in an upcoming commit for testing the
> path MTU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>

...

> @@ -1702,12 +1711,43 @@ class OvsVport(GenericNetlinkSocket):
>          msg["dpifindex"] = dpindex
>          port_type = OvsVport.str_to_type(ptype)
>  
> -        msg["attrs"].append(["OVS_VPORT_ATTR_TYPE", port_type])
>          msg["attrs"].append(["OVS_VPORT_ATTR_NAME", vport_ifname])
>          msg["attrs"].append(
>              ["OVS_VPORT_ATTR_UPCALL_PID", [self.upcall_packet.epid]]
>          )
>  
> +        TUNNEL_DEFAULTS = [("geneve", 6081),
> +                           ("vxlan", 4798)]

Hi Aaron,

It is corrected as part of another patch in this series, but
the correct port for vxlan is 4789 (i.e. 89 rather than 98).

With that fixed, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

..