netdev - [TEST] TCP MD5 vs kmemleak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240617072451.1403e1d2@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:24:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [TEST] TCP MD5 vs kmemleak

Hi Dmitry!

We added kmemleak checks to the selftest runners, TCP AO/MD5 tests seem
to trip it:

https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-tcp-ao-dbg/results/643761/4-unsigned-md5-ipv6/stdout

Could you take a look? kmemleak is not infallible, it could be a false
positive.