[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240618141157.1881093-2-marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:11:52 +0200
From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH iwl-next 1/6] ice: Remove unused struct ice_prot_lkup_ext members
Remove field_off as it's never used.
Remove done bitmap, as its value is only checked and never assigned.
Reusing sub-recipes while creating new root recipes is currently not
supported in the driver.
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
---
.../ethernet/intel/ice/ice_protocol_type.h | 4 --
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c | 44 ++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_protocol_type.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_protocol_type.h
index 755a9c55267c..c396dabacef4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_protocol_type.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_protocol_type.h
@@ -452,13 +452,9 @@ struct ice_prot_lkup_ext {
u16 prot_type;
u8 n_val_words;
/* create a buffer to hold max words per recipe */
- u16 field_off[ICE_MAX_CHAIN_WORDS];
u16 field_mask[ICE_MAX_CHAIN_WORDS];
struct ice_fv_word fv_words[ICE_MAX_CHAIN_WORDS];
-
- /* Indicate field offsets that have field vector indices assigned */
- DECLARE_BITMAP(done, ICE_MAX_CHAIN_WORDS);
};
struct ice_pref_recipe_group {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
index 1191031b2a43..0d58cf185698 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
@@ -4918,33 +4918,27 @@ ice_create_first_fit_recp_def(struct ice_hw *hw,
*recp_cnt = 0;
- /* Walk through every word in the rule to check if it is not done. If so
- * then this word needs to be part of a new recipe.
- */
- for (j = 0; j < lkup_exts->n_val_words; j++)
- if (!test_bit(j, lkup_exts->done)) {
- if (!grp ||
- grp->n_val_pairs == ICE_NUM_WORDS_RECIPE) {
- struct ice_recp_grp_entry *entry;
-
- entry = devm_kzalloc(ice_hw_to_dev(hw),
- sizeof(*entry),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!entry)
- return -ENOMEM;
- list_add(&entry->l_entry, rg_list);
- grp = &entry->r_group;
- (*recp_cnt)++;
- }
-
- grp->pairs[grp->n_val_pairs].prot_id =
- lkup_exts->fv_words[j].prot_id;
- grp->pairs[grp->n_val_pairs].off =
- lkup_exts->fv_words[j].off;
- grp->mask[grp->n_val_pairs] = lkup_exts->field_mask[j];
- grp->n_val_pairs++;
+ for (j = 0; j < lkup_exts->n_val_words; j++) {
+ if (!grp || grp->n_val_pairs == ICE_NUM_WORDS_RECIPE) {
+ struct ice_recp_grp_entry *entry;
+
+ entry = devm_kzalloc(ice_hw_to_dev(hw), sizeof(*entry),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!entry)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ list_add(&entry->l_entry, rg_list);
+ grp = &entry->r_group;
+ (*recp_cnt)++;
}
+ grp->pairs[grp->n_val_pairs].prot_id =
+ lkup_exts->fv_words[j].prot_id;
+ grp->pairs[grp->n_val_pairs].off = lkup_exts->fv_words[j].off;
+ grp->mask[grp->n_val_pairs] = lkup_exts->field_mask[j];
+ grp->n_val_pairs++;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
--
2.45.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists