[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64b3c847-8674-4fdd-bbe6-8ea22410aa19@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:46:40 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nbd@....name, lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, conor@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, upstream@...oha.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
benjamin.larsson@...exis.eu, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
rkannoth@...vell.com, sgoutham@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: airoha: Introduce ethernet support
for EN7581 SoC
> +static void airoha_fe_maccr_init(struct airoha_eth *eth)
> +{
...
> + airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(11), 0xc057); /* PPP->IPv6CP (0xc057) */
include/uapi/linux/ppp_defs.h
#define PPP_IPV6CP 0x8057 /* IPv6 Control Protocol */
Are these the same thing? Why is there one bit difference?
> + airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(17), 0x1ae0);
> + airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_EN(17),
> + PATN_FCPU_EN_MASK | PATN_SP_EN_MASK |
> + FIELD_PREP(PATN_TYPE_MASK, 3) | PATN_EN_MASK);
> +
> + airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(18), 0x1ae00000);
> + airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_EN(18),
> + PATN_FCPU_EN_MASK | PATN_DP_EN_MASK |
> + FIELD_PREP(PATN_TYPE_MASK, 3) | PATN_EN_MASK);
> + airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(22), 0xaaaa);
Please add a comment what these match.
> +static int airoha_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
I don't think this is needed. Look at __dev_set_mtu().
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists