netdev - Re: [net-next,v9] net: ethernet: rtsn: Add support for Renesas Ethernet-TSN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8cacac1d-b9ca-4fbc-b92a-60447f8fb178@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:15:37 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v9] net: ethernet: rtsn: Add support for Renesas
 Ethernet-TSN

> > +static int rtsn_tx_free(struct net_device *ndev, bool free_txed_only)
> > +{
> > +	struct rtsn_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +	struct rtsn_ext_desc *desc;
> > +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +	int free_num = 0;
> > +	int entry, size;
> > +
> > +	for (; priv->cur_tx - priv->dirty_tx > 0; priv->dirty_tx++) {
> > +		entry = priv->dirty_tx % priv->num_tx_ring;
> > +		desc = &priv->tx_ring[entry];
> > +		if (free_txed_only && (desc->die_dt & DT_MASK) != DT_FEMPTY)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		dma_rmb();
> > +		size = le16_to_cpu(desc->info_ds) & TX_DS;
> > +		skb = priv->tx_skb[entry];
> > +		if (skb) {
> > +			if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP) {
> > +				struct skb_shared_hwtstamps shhwtstamps;
> > +				struct timespec64 ts;
> > +
> > +				rtsn_get_timestamp(priv, &ts);
> > +				memset(&shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shhwtstamps));
> > +				shhwtstamps.hwtstamp = timespec64_to_ktime(ts);
> > +				skb_tstamp_tx(skb, &shhwtstamps);
> > +			}
> > +			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
> > +					 le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> > +					 size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > +			dev_kfree_skb_any(priv->tx_skb[entry]);
> > +			free_num++;
> > +		}
> > +		desc->die_dt = DT_EEMPTY;
> > +		priv->stats.tx_packets++;
> if (!skb) case also, incrementing the tx_packets. Is this correct ?

Please trim the text when replying. Is this the only comment in this
1500 line email? Did i miss more with my page-down, page-down,
page-down.....

	Andrew