[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240618164939.0a0e5f4b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:49:39 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: <edward.cree@....com>
Cc: <linux-net-drivers@....com>, <davem@...emloft.com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, Edward Cree
<ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>, <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>,
<jdamato@...tly.com>, <mw@...ihalf.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
<hkelam@...vell.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>, <leon@...nel.org>,
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/7] net: ethtool: attach an XArray of
custom RSS contexts to a netdevice
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:44:22 +0100 edward.cree@....com wrote:
> + xa_erase(&dev->ethtool->rss_ctx, context);
> + if (dev->ethtool_ops->cap_rss_ctx_supported)
> + dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxfh(dev, &rxfh, NULL);
> + else /* can't happen */
> + pr_warn_once("No callback to remove RSS context from %s\n",
> + netdev_name(dev));
nit: I'd be tempted to call dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxfh()
unconditionally. Is there a legit scenario where context
may exist but there's no set_rxfh callback?
If you prefer to keep the check - netdev_warn_once() ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists