netdev - Re: [PATCH vhost 08/23] vdpa/mlx5: Clear and reinitialize software VQ data on reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:28:05 +0200
From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
To: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, 
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, 
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost 08/23] vdpa/mlx5: Clear and reinitialize software VQ
 data on reset

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:08 PM Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> The hardware VQ configuration is mirrored by data in struct
> mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue . Instead of clearing just a few fields at reset,
> fully clear the struct and initialize with the appropriate default
> values.
>
> As clear_vqs_ready() is used only during reset, get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>

Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>

> ---
>  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 16 +++-------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index c8b5c87f001d..de013b5a2815 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -2941,18 +2941,6 @@ static void teardown_vq_resources(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
>         ndev->setup = false;
>  }
>
> -static void clear_vqs_ready(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> -{
> -       int i;
> -
> -       for (i = 0; i < ndev->mvdev.max_vqs; i++) {
> -               ndev->vqs[i].ready = false;
> -               ndev->vqs[i].modified_fields = 0;
> -       }
> -
> -       ndev->mvdev.cvq.ready = false;
> -}
> -
>  static int setup_cvq_vring(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>  {
>         struct mlx5_control_vq *cvq = &mvdev->cvq;
> @@ -3035,12 +3023,14 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_compat_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u32 flags)
>         down_write(&ndev->reslock);
>         unregister_link_notifier(ndev);
>         teardown_vq_resources(ndev);
> -       clear_vqs_ready(ndev);
> +       init_mvqs(ndev);

Nitpick / suggestion if you have to send a v2. The init_mvqs function
name sounds like it can allocate stuff that needs to be released to
me. But I'm very bad at naming :). Maybe something like
"mvqs_set_defaults" or similar?

> +
>         if (flags & VDPA_RESET_F_CLEAN_MAP)
>                 mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr_resources(&ndev->mvdev);
>         ndev->mvdev.status = 0;
>         ndev->mvdev.suspended = false;
>         ndev->cur_num_vqs = MLX5V_DEFAULT_VQ_COUNT;
> +       ndev->mvdev.cvq.ready = false;
>         ndev->mvdev.cvq.received_desc = 0;
>         ndev->mvdev.cvq.completed_desc = 0;
>         memset(ndev->event_cbs, 0, sizeof(*ndev->event_cbs) * (mvdev->max_vqs + 1));
>
> --
> 2.45.1
>