netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/5] net: phy: add driver for built-in 2.5G ethernet PHY on MT7988

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac5cfcdeefb350af4467fe163b8a93b7873d3889.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:44:32 +0000
From: SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤)
	<SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>
To: "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Steven Liu (劉人豪) <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"daniel@...rotopia.org" <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/5] net: phy: add driver for built-in 2.5G
 ethernet PHY on MT7988

On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 10:09 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:40:23PM +0800, Sky Huang wrote:
> > +static const unsigned long supported_triggers =
> > +(BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_FULL_DUPLEX) |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_LINK)        |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_LINK_10)     |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_LINK_100)    |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_LINK_1000)   |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_LINK_2500)   |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_RX)          |
> > + BIT(TRIGGER_NETDEV_TX));
> 
> Absolutely no need for the outer parens around this.
> 
> type foo assignment-operator expr;
> 
> There is no reason to ever put parens around expr in this kind of
> thing.
> assignment-operator are things like =, |=, &=, <<=, >>=, and so
> forth.
> 
> Excessive parens detracts from readability, and leads to mistakes. If
> operator precedence is a worry, then knowing the common C precedence
> rules rather than littering code with extra parens would be good so
> that code can remain readable.
> 
I'll fix this in next version.

> > +static struct phy_driver mtk_gephy_driver[] = {
> > +{
> > +PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(MTK_2P5GPHY_ID_MT7988),
> > +.name= "MediaTek MT7988 2.5GbE PHY",
> > +.probe= mt798x_2p5ge_phy_probe,
> > +.config_init= mt798x_2p5ge_phy_config_init,
> > +.config_aneg    = mt798x_2p5ge_phy_config_aneg,
> > +.get_features= mt798x_2p5ge_phy_get_features,
> > +.read_status= mt798x_2p5ge_phy_read_status,
> > +.get_rate_matching= mt798x_2p5ge_phy_get_rate_matching,
> > +.suspend= genphy_suspend,
> > +.resume= genphy_resume,
> > +.read_page= mtk_phy_read_page,
> > +.write_page= mtk_phy_write_page,
> > +.led_blink_set= mt798x_2p5ge_phy_led_blink_set,
> > +.led_brightness_set = mt798x_2p5ge_phy_led_brightness_set,
> > +.led_hw_is_supported = mt798x_2p5ge_phy_led_hw_is_supported,
> > +.led_hw_control_get = mt798x_2p5ge_phy_led_hw_control_get,
> > +.led_hw_control_set = mt798x_2p5ge_phy_led_hw_control_set,
> 
> I don't see the point of trying to align some of these method
> declarators but not others. Consistency is important.
> 
Sorry I don't get your point on this. What do you mean by "trying to
align some of these method declarators but not others"? Do you mean
"mt798x_2p5ge_phy" prefix?

BRs,
Sky

> I know several PHY drivers do this, this will be because new methods
> with longer names have been added over time, and to reformat the
> tables of every driver would be noise. However, new implementations
> should at least make an effort to have consistency.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!